The study on conversational habits published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin explores two key biases: the “reticence bias” and the “halo ignorance effect.” The reticence bias leads people to believe they should speak less than half the time in a conversation to be liked. In reality, speaking more—at least half the time—makes individuals more likable. The halo ignorance effect refers to the mistaken belief that being likable and interesting are separate, when conversation partners form global impressions based on both traits combined. This research highlights that engaging more in conversations can boost both likability and interest.
https://dtg.sites.fas.harvard.edu/HIRSCHI%20WILSON%20GILBERT%202022.pdf
https://www.psypost.org/people-hold-incorrect-beliefs-about-how-much-to-talk-in-conversations/
A 2023 study in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin highlights two key biases in conversation that can undermine social interactions. The “reticence bias” leads people to believe that speaking less makes them more likable, but research shows speaking more actually enhances likability. The “halo ignorance effect” occurs when individuals think that being likable and interesting are separate, but overall impressions combine both traits. To foster better conversations, it’s recommended to engage in self-disclosure, ask open-ended questions, and practice active listening.
0 Comments