logo metameha

PP405 hair regrowth shows promise (but not a cure)

29 Mar 2025 | Hair | 0 comments

Hair loss can be deeply distressing, so it is natural that many people search online for a “cure for baldness.” The new PP405 hair regrowth treatment from UCLA has attracted attention because it tries something different: instead of just slowing loss, it aims to wake up dormant hair follicles so they start growing full hairs again. Early trials are encouraging, but PP405 is still experimental, and it will not work for everyone.

PP405 hair regrowth: how the new molecule works

For most people with androgenetic alopecia, or pattern baldness, the follicles do not die. They shrink and switch into a long resting state, producing thin, short hairs instead of thick strands. Standard treatments like minoxidil and finasteride try to nudge this cycle, but they often give modest gains and must be used for many months before results appear.

PP405 takes another path. UCLA scientists studying stem cells in mouse and human hair follicles found a metabolic “switch” that keeps these cells dormant. By designing a small molecule that hits this switch, they found a way to coax follicle stem cells back into an active state so the follicle can enter a new growth phase.

From UCLA lab discovery to Pelage Pharmaceuticals

The PP405 story began in William Lowry’s lab at UCLA, where researchers looked at how hair follicle stem cells decide when to rest and when to grow. They identified a target in the cells’ energy pathways and developed PP405 to act on it. UCLA then licensed the intellectual property around PP405 and related compounds to a startup, Pelage Pharmaceuticals, in 2018.

Pelage, backed by Google Ventures and other investors, has since raised tens of millions of dollars to move the drug through clinical trials. The company describes PP405 as a novel, non-invasive topical molecule that is applied to the scalp to reactivate dormant hair follicle stem cells and restart hair growth.

A metabolic switch in hair follicle stem cells

Hair follicle stem cells sit in a small niche in the skin and cycle between rest and activity. In pattern baldness, the growth phase gets shorter, the resting phase gets longer, and hairs become thinner over time. PP405 appears to work by shifting how these stem cells handle energy, pushing them out of dormancy. In lab studies and early human biopsies, treatment with PP405 increased markers of stem cell activation in the follicles.

Unlike hormone-blocking drugs, PP405 does not target testosterone or dihydrotestosterone (DHT) directly. That is important, because hormonal drugs such as finasteride can have sexual and mood side effects in a small share of users, and regulators now warn patients to watch for these problems.

PP405 vs older drugs like minoxidil and finasteride

Today, only two medicines, minoxidil and finasteride, are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for androgenetic alopecia. They can slow further loss and regrow some hair, but many people find the effect limited, especially if their baldness is already advanced. Minoxidil must be applied twice a day, and finasteride is taken daily as a pill. Stopping either drug usually leads to renewed shedding.

PP405 is applied as a topical liquid once a day. Instead of changing blood hormones or simply improving blood flow, it targets the follicle stem cells themselves. If it continues to prove safe and effective, it could become a first-in-class regenerative treatment that helps some people grow new terminal hair, not just thicker “peach fuzz.” But it would still likely require ongoing use to maintain gains, just like other medical hair-loss treatments.

PP405 hair loss trials: what the studies show so far

Any new drug must move step by step through human trials. PP405 is currently in Phase 2a studies, which means it has passed initial safety tests but still needs larger trials before regulators can decide on approval.

Phase 1 safety and stem cell activation results

In its first human trial, PP405 was tested mainly for safety and biological activity. Volunteers with pattern hair loss applied the topical treatment on their scalp for a short period. According to Pelage, the Phase 1 results showed that PP405 was well tolerated and caused statistically significant activation of hair follicle stem cells in treated areas, without serious side effects.

Because this early study focused on lab markers and safety, it did not yet tell doctors how much visible hair regrowth people might expect. That requires larger, longer trials with careful counts of hair density and thickness.

Phase 2a early signs of thicker, denser hair

In 2024, Pelage launched a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2a trial in around 60-78 adults with androgenetic alopecia, including both women and men. Participants applied PP405 or a matching placebo to their scalp once per day for four weeks and were then followed for about three months.

The company and independent reports state that the trial met its primary safety and pharmacokinetic goals. No PP405 was detected in blood samples, which supports the idea that the drug stays local to the skin. For exploratory hair growth outcomes, early data showed that roughly 31% of men with more advanced hair loss who used PP405 achieved more than a 20% increase in hair density at week 8, compared with 0% in the placebo group.

A 20% density gain means that if a patch had 100 hairs per square centimetre at baseline, it might have around 120 after treatment. That may not sound dramatic, but for many people it can change how the scalp looks in daily life, especially when combined with styling.

Who joined the PP405 androgenetic alopecia studies

The Phase 2a study made a point of enrolling people across a wide range of skin tones and hair textures, which has not always been the case in hair loss research. Both women and men with mild to moderate pattern baldness could join, as long as their follicles were still present and capable of growth.

This matters, because androgenetic alopecia is extremely common in every group. Studies suggest that by age 70, up to 80% of men and about half of women show signs of pattern hair loss, and the condition can have strong effects on self-esteem and mood, especially for women.

What PP405 could change for pattern baldness

If future Phase 3 trials confirm the early results, PP405 could shift the hair-loss landscape in several ways. Still, it is important not to confuse “promising new option” with “cure for everyone.”

Benefits compared with current hair loss treatments

Because PP405 is non-hormonal and stays in the skin, it may avoid some of the systemic side effects linked to oral finasteride, though this will need long-term confirmation. It also appears to work faster than many existing options: visible gains were reported a few months after just four weeks of use, while many current treatments require six to twelve months of continuous therapy before changes are easy to see.

If PP405 truly reactivates follicles that had stopped producing visible hair, it could help people who feel they have run out of options after trying minoxidil, finasteride, or even hair transplant surgery. That said, early trials have been short, and we still do not know how well results hold up over years.

Limits: scarring, late-stage baldness, long-term use

PP405 can only act where follicles and stem cells are still present. In areas of long-standing, shiny baldness where the follicles have scarred or disappeared, no topical treatment is likely to restore hair. Reports also suggest that the best responses so far have been in people with mild to moderate hair loss rather than those with the most advanced thinning.

Like almost all hair-loss medicines, PP405 will probably need to be used indefinitely to keep its benefits. The hair cycle is ongoing; once the drug is stopped, the underlying genetic and hormonal forces that drive pattern baldness will still be there. This is similar to how minoxidil and finasteride must be continued to maintain results.

Side effects, costs and access questions

So far, trials report that PP405 has been well tolerated, with no serious safety signals and no drug detected in the bloodstream. But larger and longer studies are needed to rule out rare side effects. Regulators typically require multi-year data before approving a new chronic-use medicine.

Cost and access also remain open questions. Hair-loss drugs and procedures can be expensive, and many insurance plans treat them as cosmetic. If PP405 reaches the market, it may be priced like other branded dermatology treatments, and availability could vary by country. Newer treatments often reach wealthier patients first, as commenters and patient advocates rightly worry.

Other emerging hair regrowth treatments

PP405 is not the only new idea in this crowded field. Several research teams are exploring ways to regenerate or reprogram hair follicles using stem cells, growth factors and energy metabolism.

Regenerative and stem cell treatments in the pipeline

Experimental work in mice has shown that combining fat-derived stem cells with energy molecules like ATP can reverse hair loss and lead to full fur regrowth, at least in animals. Other studies aim to grow new hair follicles in lab-grown skin or to deliver pro-growth signals like SCUBE3 directly into the scalp. These approaches are still far from routine clinical use but illustrate the broader push toward regenerative solutions.

Laser and light-based therapies, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, and microneedling with or without drug solutions also seek to stimulate local repair and growth, though the strength of evidence varies. People considering these should ask their doctor which methods are backed by controlled trials.

Lifestyle, hormones and why hair still matters so much

Androgenetic alopecia arises from a mix of genes, hormones, age and health factors. While you cannot change your DNA, general health habits like not smoking, eating a balanced diet, managing stress and staying active support skin and hair health in broad ways. At the same time, even perfect habits cannot fully override a strong inherited tendency to lose hair.

For many people, hair is closely tied to identity and attractiveness. Sudden or early hair loss can trigger anxiety and sadness. Recognising this emotional weight is important; wanting to treat hair loss is not vanity, it is a normal wish to feel like yourself.

How to read bold baldness headlines with care

Recent media coverage of PP405 has asked if scientists cured baldness, echoing many past stories that promised a final fix. A good rule of thumb is to look for four details in any such article: what kind of study was done (lab, animal, early human, large trial), how many people were involved, how long they were followed, and whether the treatment is approved or still in testing.

If an article does not answer those questions, treat it as early hype. With PP405, we know that Phase 2a data look promising and that Phase 3 trials are planned around 2026. That is hopeful news, but it is not the same as a widely available cure.

What you can do about hair loss right now

Even as new treatments move through trials, there are concrete steps you can take today if you are worried about thinning hair.

Seeing a dermatologist and getting a clear diagnosis

First, see a dermatologist or other qualified doctor who regularly treats hair disorders. Hair loss has many causes, including pattern baldness, autoimmune disease, hormonal problems, iron deficiency and medication side effects. A good exam, and sometimes blood tests or a small scalp biopsy, can tell these apart.

Getting the diagnosis right matters because treatments differ. For example, alopecia areata, an autoimmune condition that causes patchy loss, is treated with immune-targeting drugs rather than minoxidil or finasteride alone.

Current evidence-based treatment options

For androgenetic alopecia, current evidence-based choices include topical minoxidil (used by both sexes), oral finasteride for men, low-level laser devices, and hair transplant surgery in selected cases. Recent trials suggest that combining topical minoxidil with finasteride can improve density more than minoxidil alone, although finasteride’s side effects must be weighed.

Doctors may also discuss off-label options like low-dose oral minoxidil or dutasteride for some patients. It is wise to avoid compounded mixtures or telehealth prescriptions that downplay known risks, especially for hormone-related drugs.

Lifestyle steps, such as managing weight, sleep and stress, also support long-term health and may help you cope better with the emotional strain of hair loss. Broader evidence suggests that, for health overall, daily habits matter more than genes, even when genetics plays a strong role.

Protecting your mental health while you wait

If hair loss is making you feel anxious, ashamed or hopeless, you are not alone. Specialists note rising public anxiety about balding, fuelled in part by social media and dating apps. Talking openly with friends, partners or a therapist can help put these feelings in context and prevent them from turning into body dysmorphic disorder, a serious condition where appearance worries take over daily life.

Simple steps, like limiting time spent on hair-loss forums or comparison-heavy social feeds, can reduce stress. Some people find comfort in temporary cosmetic options such as hair fibres, careful styling or wigs while they explore medical treatments.

If you are tempted by expensive “miracle cures” online, remember that most are unproven at best and scams at worst. When in doubt, ask a medical professional which claims are backed by controlled studies.

Sources & related information

UCLA – Did UCLA just cure baldness? PP405 breakthrough treatment (2025)

This UCLA Magazine piece explains how researchers identified PP405 as a small molecule that can wake up dormant hair follicle stem cells, describes early human trial results, and stresses that the treatment will not work for everyone and still needs years of testing. The article also describes the creation of Pelage Pharmaceuticals to develop PP405 into a drug.

Pelage Pharmaceuticals / UCLA TDG – Pelage advances PP405 into Phase 2a trial (2024)

A joint release from Pelage and UCLA Technology Development Group outlines Phase 2a trial for PP405, including the goal of reactivating dormant hair follicle stem cells, inclusive recruitment of women and men of many skin and hair types, and the company’s Series A-1 funding round.

Businesswire – Positive Phase 2a clinical trial results for PP405 (2025)

This Businesswire press release reports early Phase 2a results, stating that PP405 is a topical, non-invasive small molecule that was well tolerated, showed statistically significant activation of hair follicle stem cells in Phase 1, and delivered early signs of clinically meaningful hair regrowth in people with androgenetic alopecia.

The Dermatology Digest – Regenerative medicine in action: topical PP405 shows promise in androgenetic alopecia (2025)

A feature in The Dermatology Digest summarises the Phase 2a trial, noting that PP405 met safety and pharmacokinetic endpoints, caused no detectable systemic exposure, and led about 31% of certain patients to gain more than 20% hair-density at eight weeks, with Phase 3 studies planned for 2026.

StatPearls / Medscape – Androgenetic alopecia overview and treatment – 2023–2024

These reference articles review how common androgenetic alopecia is in men and women, explain its causes, and confirm that minoxidil and finasteride remain the only FDA-approved drugs for this condition, with low-level laser therapy also used, while newer treatments like PP405 are still investigational. You can also read a clinical overview with similar conclusions.

The Washington Post – Newest side effect of hair loss: more public anxiety (2025)

A Washington Post story on the emotional toll of hair loss discusses the limits of current treatments and mentions PP405 as one of several experimental therapies now in clinical trials, stressing that they are promising but not yet cures or widely available.

Meta description (157 chars): PP405 hair regrowth treatment from UCLA may help androgenetic alopecia by reactivating dormant hair follicles, but trials and FDA approval are still ongoing.

Disclaimer: The information shared here is for awareness only. Review the provided sources, cross-check with other trusted references, and talk about it with qualified healthcare professionals before making any medical decision.

Help us improve this article

Add a clear point? Share it in comment.

Link or video not working? Post a new one that works in comment.

Fact wrong or out-of-date? Write the correct info in comment.

Your feedback helps keep the content accurate and valuable.

 

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recently added

Listening is the underrated skill that makes you a better leader instantly

We often think of great leaders as great talkers. We imagine them giving rousing speeches, setting a clear vision, and having an answer for everything. But a massive review of scientific research suggests we have it backward. The most effective way to improve your leadership isn’t to speak more; it is to listen better.

New data shows that listening is not just a “soft skill” for making friends – it is a hard driver of job performance and professional success.

144 studies confirm listening drives performance

A recent meta-analysis published in the Journal of Business and Psychology examined the link between listening and work outcomes. The researchers looked at data from 144 studies involving more than 155,000 people.

Their conclusion was clear: listening has a strong, positive effect on employee job performance.

Leaders who are perceived as good listeners do more than just make their employees feel warm and fuzzy. They actually get better results. The study found that listening improves the quality of relationships at work, which in turn boosts performance. When employees feel heard, they perform better. This dynamic helps leaders unlearn bias and lower conflict within teams.

As the researchers noted, the link between listening and positive job outcomes is “robust.” They suggest that listening is an underrated predictor of job performance – a simple cause of superior results that many organizations overlook.

Why we love to talk about ourselves

If listening is so effective, why is it so hard? Why do so many of us default to talking instead?

The answer lies in our biology. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) found that talking about ourselves is inherently rewarding. In fact, humans devote about 30–40 percent of everyday speech to informing others about their own subjective experiences – their thoughts, feelings, and opinions.

Using brain scans, researchers found that self-disclosure activates the mesolimbic dopamine system – the same brain regions associated with the pleasure we get from food, money, and sex. It feels good to talk about yourself.

The drive is so strong that people in the study were willing to give up money just to keep talking about themselves. When given a choice between answering questions about others for a higher payment or answering questions about themselves for a lower payment, participants voluntarily gave up between 17 and 25 percent of their potential earnings to talk about their own views.

We are wired to broadcast. To lead effectively, you have to fight that wiring.

The power of follow-up questions

You can become a better listener instantly by changing how you ask questions. It is not enough to just stay silent; you need to show you are engaged.

Research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that the specific type of question you ask matters. The study showed that asking follow-up questions – questions that ask for more detail on what the other person just said – dramatically increases how likable you appear.

When you ask a follow-up question, you prove you were listening. You signal validation, care, and understanding. This simple habit makes you more persuasive and influential because, as other research in Frontiers in Psychology shows, likable people are better at influencing those around them.

Asking follow-up questions and recalling small details are among seven habits that mark an exceptional listener, and this research confirms it is a key tool for leaders.

Feeling known leads to feeling supported

Listening does more than build rapport; it meets a fundamental human need.

A study in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that employees feel less objectified when their boss knows them as people, rather than just as workers or numbers. Furthermore, research linked to the Journal of Experimental Psychology suggests that “feeling known” is a necessary precursor to “feeling supported.”

You cannot support an employee you do not know. You cannot help them reach their career goals if you never asked what those goals were. You cannot solve their roadblocks if you never listened to what those roadblocks are.

What you can do about it

To become a better leader today, flip the ratio of your conversations.

  • Talk less. Recognize that your brain wants the dopamine hit of talking about yourself. Resist it.
  • Ask for their story, not yours. Instead of telling your team about your weekend or your problems, ask about theirs.
  • Use the follow-up rule. When an employee answers, do not just nod and move on. Restate what they said or ask one follow-up question based on what they just said.
  • Listen to learn. You already know what you know. The only way to learn something new is to listen to what others know.

Mastering conversation: how active listening keeps dialogue engaging is a skill you can practice in every interaction, whether with a colleague, a client, or a friend.

Sources & related information

Journal of Business and Psychology – The Power of Listening at Work – 2023

A meta-analysis of 144 studies involving 155,000 observations found that perceived listening is strongly correlated with improved job performance and relationship quality.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding – 2012

Neuroimaging research shows that self-disclosure activates the brain’s reward systems, motivating people to talk about themselves even at a financial cost.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology – It Doesn’t Hurt to Ask – 2017

A series of studies demonstrates that asking follow-up questions increases interpersonal liking by signaling responsiveness and listening.

The Pratfall Effect: why making mistakes can make you more likable

Perfection is often overrated. While we strive to be flawless in job interviews or first dates, psychology suggests that being too perfect can actually push people away. A small blunder, like tripping or spilling a drink, might do more for your popularity than a flawless performance. This phenomenon is known as the Pratfall Effect.

What is the Pratfall Effect?

The Pratfall Effect is a psychological principle that states that a person’s likability increases when they make a clumsy mistake, but only if that person is already perceived as competent.

Social psychologist Elliot Aronson first identified this effect in 1966. He wanted to test how mistakes influence attraction. In his famous experiment, he asked male college students to listen to tape recordings of people answering quiz questions.

The participants heard one of two main scenarios:

  1. The Superior Person: This person answered 92% of the questions correctly. They sounded confident and knowledgeable.
  2. The Average Person: This person answered only 30% of the questions correctly.

Aronson then added a twist. In some recordings, the “Superior Person” commits a blunder at the end: they are heard spilling a cup of coffee and reacting to the mess.

The results were clear. The students rated the Superior Person who spilled the coffee as the most likable of all. The blunder made the highly competent person seem more human and approachable.

The catch: competence is key

There is a crucial condition to this effect. A mistake only helps you if you have already established your competence.

In Aronson’s experiment, when the “Average Person” (who missed most quiz questions) spilled the coffee, their likability rating dropped even further.

  • If you are competent: A mistake humanizes you. It breaks the “too good to be true” barrier and prevents others from feeling threatened by your perfection.
  • If you are incompetent: A mistake just reinforces the idea that you are not capable. It acts as proof of inadequacy.

This distinction is vital. You cannot simply be clumsy and expect to be popular. You must first demonstrate that you are good at what you do. The blunder acts as a softener for your competence, not a substitute for it.

Real-world examples: from Jennifer Lawrence to brands

We see the Pratfall Effect in action in celebrity culture and marketing.

The relatable celebrity

Jennifer Lawrence is often cited as a modern example. Her frequent trips on the red carpet or candid, unpolished interviews often endear her to the public. Because she is an Oscar-winning, highly successful actress (high competence), these slips make her seem “down to earth” rather than clumsy.

The honest brand

Marketing experts use a similar concept known as the “blemishing effect.” When a brand admits a small flaw, consumers often trust it more. For example, Guinness: the beer brand famously turned a negative – the long time it takes to pour a pint – into a legendary slogan: “Good things come to those who wait.”

Why perfectionism harms connection

The Pratfall Effect challenges the idea that we must hide our flaws to be accepted. In social situations, perfection creates distance. We often struggle to connect with someone who seems to have no weaknesses because we cannot relate to them. This relates to understanding conversational biases to become more likable, where showing genuine engagement often matters more than saying the perfect thing.

When a competent person slips up, it levels the playing field. It signals vulnerability. This vulnerability fosters trust and signals that the person is authentic, not a curated persona.

What you can do about it

You do not need to stage accidents or spill coffee on purpose. However, you can change how you react to your own errors.

  • Don’t hide every flaw: If you are good at your job, admitting a small error or a gap in knowledge can make you more approachable to your team.
  • Own your blunders: When you trip or misspeak, laugh it off. Trying to cover it up often looks worse than the mistake itself.
  • Build competence first: Remember that this effect relies on a foundation of skill. Focus on being capable and reliable first.
  • Accept imperfection in others: Just as your mistakes humanize you, seeing others stumble is a reminder that everyone is human. This perspective can help reduce judgment and social anxiety.

Sources & related information

Elliot Aronson – The Effect of a Pratfall on Increasing Interpersonal Attractiveness – 1966

The original study published in Psychonomic Science where Aronson and his colleagues demonstrated that a blunder increases the attractiveness of a superior person but decreases the attractiveness of a mediocre person.

The Guardian (ZenithOptimedia) – The Pratfall effect and why brands should flaunt their flaws – 2015

An analysis of how brands like Guinness and VW use the Pratfall Effect to build trust by admitting minor weaknesses, making their core claims more believable.

Journal of Consumer Research – The blemishing effect – 2012

Research showing that under certain processing conditions, a small amount of negative information can actually enhance the positive impression of a product.

Endmyopia claims to reverse nearsightedness naturally (but science remains skeptical)

Imagine never needing your glasses again. No surgery, no contacts, just… fixing your eyes yourself. That’s the big promise of Endmyopia, a popular online method created by Jake Steiner. He claims you can reverse nearsightedness (myopia) just by changing your habits.

It sounds awesome, right? But before you throw away your glasses, you need to know that most eye doctors and scientists say it’s not that simple. Here is the lowdown on what this method is, why people try it, and why the medical consensus says it probably won’t work like you think.

The big claim: “Your glasses are the problem”

Endmyopia is based on a simple idea: your eyes aren’t broken; they are just reacting to your environment.

It starts with a muscle cramp

The theory goes like this: when you spend hours staring at your phone or laptop, a focusing muscle inside your eye gets tired and cramps up. This is called pseudo-myopia. At first, your vision is only blurry because of this cramp.

Then your eye grows longer

The controversial part is what happens next. Steiner says that when you wear glasses to fix that blur, your eye physically grows longer to “adapt” to the lenses. A longer eyeball is what causes true nearsightedness. Basically, the method claims your glasses trap you in a cycle that makes your vision worse.

The “fix”: training your eyes

To reverse this, Endmyopia tells you to do two things:

  1. Use weaker glasses: Instead of your full prescription, you wear weaker glasses for close-up work (like homework or gaming) to stop the eye strain.
  2. Practice “Active Focus”: This is a mental trick. You look at something far away that is slightly blurry (like a street sign) and try hard to make it clear just by focusing. The idea is that this effort forces your eyeball to shrink back to its normal size.

What science says

Here is the problem: Eye doctors agree that once your eyeball grows too long, it usually stays that way. It’s like your height – once you grow tall, you don’t shrink back down just because you want to.

Your eyeballs aren’t like muscles

You can train a muscle to get bigger, but you can’t really train an eyeball to get shorter. While atropine drops or special contact lenses can slow down eye growth in kids, there is no scientific proof that you can reverse it significantly once it’s happened.

Wearing weak glasses might backfire

Trying to fix your eyes by wearing weaker glasses can actually make things worse. A famous study (Chung et al., 2002) showed that under-correcting vision (wearing glasses that are too weak) made kids’ eyes grow faster, not slower. Blurry vision seems to signal the eye to keep growing, which is the exact opposite of what you want.

Why do some people swear it works?

If science says it doesn’t work, why are there so many success stories online? Read on Reddit: I was able to effectively fully cure myopia with my own methodology of eye exercises and discussions about do eye exercise really work?.

Brain training vs. Eye shrinking

When you practice looking at blurry things, your brain gets smarter at guessing what it’s seeing. This is called blur adaptation. You might be able to read a sign further away, not because your eyes are fixed, but because your brain is better at decoding the fuzzy image. You are “seeing” better, but your nearsightedness hasn’t actually disappeared.

Is there any hope?

Interestingly, some new research on red light therapy shows that specific light treatments might slightly shorten the eye.

Is it worth trying?

Trying to fix your eyes this way takes a huge amount of time – years of daily practice. Walking around (or driving!) with blurry vision can be dangerous.

Sources & related information

Study: Weak glasses make eyes worse (2002)

A major study showed that giving kids weaker glasses actually made their nearsightedness get worse faster.

Experts: Can you reverse myopia?

Eye doctors explain that while eye spasms can be fixed, the actual shape of a nearsighted eye is permanent.

Endmyopia Website

The source of the “active focus” method and the theory that glasses are to blame.

Red Light Therapy Study (2022)

A study showing that a specific type of red light therapy could shrink the eye slightly, proving some change is possible.