The UK Covid-19 Inquiry has revealed that senior scientific advisers were often sidelined while their public presence was used to give political decisions a stamp of scientific credibility. The column by public health professor Devi Sridhar argues that England’s chief medical officer Chris Whitty and the government’s chief scientific adviser Patrick Vallance disagreed with key policies in private, yet appeared at briefings that made the government look competent to the public.
Evidence disclosed to the inquiry, including extracts from Vallance’s diaries, supports the view that scientific advice was repeatedly diluted or delayed inside No 10. One example is the restaurant subsidy plan known as Eat Out to Help Out, which advisers warned would increase infections. Despite concerns, the scheme went ahead. The diary material and testimony describe a system marked by confusion and political pressure that limited the impact of scientific counsel.
Sridhar shares that she wrote to Chris Whitty in May 2020 warning that ministers were using “follow the science” as a shield for political choices. She also points to moments when advisers tried to avoid being used for political optics, such as objecting to a post-scandal press event linked to Dominic Cummings. Even so, advisers rarely contradicted ministers in public, which reduced trust and blurred the line between independent advice and political messaging.
The column ends with a clear policy question. If advisers employed by government cannot speak freely in public, should their independence and authority be strengthened, or should truly independent advisory groups be brought inside decision making. Without changes, the next crisis may again see science used to justify choices rather than guide them.
UK Covid-19 Inquiry, Module 2 Day 22 transcript, Sir Patrick Vallance – 2023
Official transcript of Vallance’s oral evidence describing limited involvement in certain policies and highlighting concerns about measures that would raise transmission, supporting the view that scientific advice was often marginalised.
Nature, ‘Politicians do not understand science’, advisers tell UK Covid inquiry – 2023
Reporting on inquiry testimony that ministers and officials struggled to understand or use scientific advice, reinforcing the article’s core concern about how advice was handled in government.
Sky News, Boris Johnson stops Whitty and Vallance answering Cummings questions – 2020
Report on the Prime Minister preventing the two senior advisers from answering questions about Dominic Cummings at a briefing, illustrating constraints on advisers’ public speech.
0 Comments