When people argue, both sides mostly want to feel heard. A simple tool can lower tension fast, even when you still disagree. It is called empathic paraphrasing. You repeat the other person’s key points in your own words, and you also name the emotion you think they are feeling. This shows you got both the facts and the feeling.
How to use it. First, listen without cutting in. Then try a short reply that covers content and emotion. For example, “You expected my call, I did not call, and that left you frustrated.” Keep it brief, neutral, and free of excuses. If you are unsure, ask a gentle check question, such as “Did I get that right?” or “Can you tell me more about what felt unfair?” These steps create safety, help the other person drop their guard, and make real problem solving possible.
What it is not. Empathy is not agreement, and it is not giving up your view. You can still share your point later. The order matters. First reflect their view and feeling, then add yours. If you start by defending yourself, the other person may hear you as cold or dismissive, which keeps the fight alive.
Why it helps. Being paraphrased signals respect. People who feel understood speak in calmer voices and feel less negative, which makes space for solutions. We also tend to judge a listener as “a bad listener” mainly because they disagree with us. Empathic paraphrasing counters this bias by proving attention and care, even during disagreement.
A quick script to try:
- “What I am hearing is … [their point].”
- “It sounds like you feel … [their emotion].”
- “Did I get that right?”
- “Would you like me to share how I see it?”
Used in this order, these lines turn a power struggle into a joint problem to solve.
Frontiers in Psychology -( Effects of empathic paraphrasing – 2012
Laboratory interviews showed that when listeners paraphrased speakers during conflict talk, speakers’ negative emotion dropped and their voice intensity fell. Physiological data suggested heightened attentive engagement during paraphrasing. The study introduces empathic paraphrasing as an effective short term way to regulate another person’s emotion in conflict.
Psychological Science – Disagreement gets mistaken for bad listening – 2024
Across multiple studies, speakers rated listeners who disagreed with them as worse listeners, even when those listeners showed solid listening behaviors. The work explains why conflicts escalate and why showing understanding is crucial when you cannot agree.
Psychological Science – Belief in the utility of cross partisan empathy reduces partisan animosity and facilitates political persuasion – 2022
Encouraging people to see empathy for opponents as useful led them to use more conciliatory language and reduced animosity, while making their messages more persuasive. This supports the value of focusing on understanding before persuasion.
0 Comments