A 2019 study showed a clear link between religiosity and pet choice in the United States. Using a nationwide survey of more than 2000 adults, researchers Samuel Perry and Ryan Burge found that people who attend church frequently are much more likely to own a dog than a cat, while those who seldom attend services or are unaffiliated with religion tilt toward cats.
The pattern holds even after accounting for factors such as politics, income and whether respondents live in cities or rural areas. Evangelical Christians, in particular, report the lowest overall pet ownership and the strongest skew toward dogs.
The authors suggest that religious conservatism encourages a “practical-utility” view of animals. Dogs fit this outlook because they readily obey commands and serve family or community functions, whereas cats prize independence and respond better to reward than punishment. A Big Think article notes that this psychological fit mirrors a top-down religious worldview built on authority and obedience.
Other commentators agree that personality may mediate the link: people drawn to structured social environments (such as regular worship) score higher on traits that favor dogs, while those who value autonomy and solitary activities often prefer cats. Importantly, newer research counters the stereotype that cat owners are anxious or antisocial, pointing out that any pet can improve mood and self-esteem when properly cared for.
How Religion Predicts Pet Ownership in the United States – Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 2019.
The paper analyses national survey data and finds that frequent worship attendance and conservative evangelical identity strongly predict dog ownership and a lower likelihood of owning cats.
0 Comments