logo metameha

Water powered humanoid robot muscles mimic human movement

11 Nov 2024 | Robots | 0 comments

Humanoid robots using water powered humanoid robot muscles sound like science fiction, but they are already moving in labs and test sites. A Polish company called Clone Robotics has built a torso and a full android whose artificial muscles run on water pressure instead of only rigid motors. Their goal is not to make toys or simple gadgets, but useful machines that move with the strength and dexterity of a human body.

In this article we explain how these hydraulic artificial muscles work, why Clone chose a biomimetic design that copies human anatomy, and where such robots might be used. We also look at what this could mean for jobs, safety, and everyday life, and suggest ways to follow progress without getting lost in hype.

How water powered humanoid robot muscles work

At the core of Clone’s design is a hydraulic system, which means a system moved by the pressure of a liquid instead of air or only electric motors. Inside the torso sits a flexible water container and a compact electric pump that plays the role of a heart. When the pump runs, it pushes water through tubes toward bundles of artificial muscles.

These artificial muscles, branded as Myofibers, are soft actuators that contract when pressurized water flows through them. They wrap around a lightweight polymer skeleton with bone-like pieces for the ribs, spine, shoulders, and arms. When one group of muscles contracts and the opposite group relaxes, the joint between them moves, just as in a human body where biceps and triceps work as a pair.

A hydraulic “vascular system” moves water like blood

The company often describes the plumbing inside the robot as a kind of artificial vascular system. In people, the heart pumps blood through arteries and veins. In the robot, the electric pump sends water through tubes to the muscles and back to the container.

Valves, which are small controlled gates, open and close to direct the water to different muscle groups. By adjusting pump speed and valve openings, the controller can create gentle motion or fast, powerful moves. Because water is nearly incompressible, hydraulic systems can deliver high force in a compact space, one reason they are widely used in heavy machinery.

Artificial muscles and tendons copy human anatomy

Clone does not simply attach a few hydraulic cylinders to metal bars. Instead, its engineers tried to copy the layout of the human upper body. The torso includes anthropomorphic shoulder joints, an actuated elbow, and a flexible cervical spine for the neck. Artificial muscles and tendons span these joints in patterns inspired by human anatomy.

This biomimetic approach, which means copying biology, has two main goals. First, it can give the robot human-like ranges of motion, such as reaching across the body, shrugging, or rotating the arm. Second, it aims to match human strength and dexterity in a body shape that can wear clothes, fit into chairs, and use the same tools that people use.

Sensors, control, and AI coordinate the motion

To move such a complex body, the robot needs many sensors and smart control software. Pressure sensors track how much water is in each muscle. Joint sensors report angles and speeds. Cameras and other depth sensors can provide vision and feedback from the environment.

Clone plans for its androids to run a graphics processing unit, or GPU, on board, which can handle advanced control and AI models. These models can learn motion patterns, balance the body, and adapt to new tasks. In early prototypes, much of the control still comes from scripted motions and teleoperation, where a human operator guides the robot, but the aim is to add more autonomy over time.

Why Clone Robotics builds biomimetic robots instead of simple machines

Many factories already have robots, but most are stiff industrial arms bolted to the floor. They are strong, precise, and fast, yet they are bad at handling random objects in tight spaces designed for humans. They also need safety cages because they move with hard, unforgiving metal parts.

Clone Robotics is taking a different path. Rather than redesigning whole factories around robot arms, it wants androids that can walk or roll into existing spaces and use the same tools, switches, and machines that people do. To do this, they are trying to copy the human body from the inside out.

From robotic hand to humanoid torso and android

The company’s first major product was the Clone Hand, a robotic hand with artificial bones, joints, and muscles that can rotate its thumb and catch a ball using a tracking glove. This hand showed that hydraulic artificial muscles could deliver both strength and fine control in a compact package.

From there, Clone built a two-arm torso with realistic shoulders, an actuated elbow, and a flexible neck. Later, they extended the concept into Clone Alpha, a full musculoskeletal android with over two hundred bone-like parts, a soft exterior shell, and a breathing system that makes the chest rise and fall. On its website, the company describes the android as a soft-bodied effector that is “powered with only water and electricity,” highlighting its water driven muscle system.

Comparing Clone robots with Tesla Optimus and other humanoids

Clone’s robots sit in a fast-moving field. Tesla’s Optimus, Boston Dynamics’ Atlas, and several other humanoids mainly use electric motors with gearboxes at each joint. These designs can be easier to model and control, but they tend to feel rigid and may need thicker shells or padding to be safe around people.

By contrast, Clone’s water powered robot muscles aim for a softer, more organic feel. The company claims its Myofiber muscles can contract faster than human muscle fibers while still being as plush as a stuffed toy on the outside. This could make physical contact safer and allow the robot to squeeze through tight spaces or absorb bumps without damage.

However, hydraulic systems bring challenges. They can leak, need careful sealing, and add complexity from pumps, valves, and tubes. Managing noise, heat, and maintenance in real factories will be key tests for the design.

Benefits and risks of lifelike robot bodies

Lifelike motion has clear upsides. A robot that moves like a person can more easily learn tasks by copying a human operator, for example through teleoperation where the person’s movements are mapped onto the robot. It can also use off-the-shelf tools and work in spaces sized for people.

On the other hand, the same human-like look and movement can unsettle observers, a reaction often called the uncanny valley. Some people find the Clone torso and android creepy or dystopian, especially when they twitch or breathe without a face. There are also broader worries about job loss, misuse in conflict, or surveillance.

Companies building these robots will need to address safety standards, data protection, and ethical use. Clear rules on where and how humanoid robots may be deployed will help reduce fear and build trust.

Where water powered humanoid robots may be used

Clone Robotics says it is not aiming first at home chores, even though some marketing clips show the android making sandwiches or vacuuming. Instead, the company emphasises uses in industrial assembly, logistics, and other tasks where human-like hands and arms are the main bottleneck.

Industrial and service tasks that need dexterity

Many factories still rely on people for steps like plugging small parts, routing cables, or handling flexible items that are hard for rigid machines. A humanoid robot with biomimetic robot muscles could take on some of these tasks, especially in settings that are repetitive, risky, or require work in tight spaces.

Water powered humanoid robots could also help in warehouses, packaging centres, or service jobs that involve frequent lifting and moving of varied objects. If they can operate standard tools and controls, they might slot into existing workflows more easily than specialised machines.

Medical and rehab uses of robotic hands

Beyond industry, Clone is exploring medical uses for its robotic hands. In some scenarios, a therapist or surgeon could control a robotic hand remotely to help a patient perform exercises or to manipulate tools in a sterile or dangerous environment.

The company has suggested that teleoperation, where a user’s movements are tracked and mirrored by the hand, could support rehabilitation by letting patients or clinicians guide precise motion without being physically present. Similar ideas already appear in other systems, such as a Japanese capsule interface that lets operators control a humanoid robot with simple muscle twitches.

Research on safe, soft robots around people

Soft robotics is a growing research area that tries to make machines with flexible bodies that can safely share space with humans. Water powered artificial muscles fit this trend, because their compliance, or ability to yield under force, can reduce the risk of injury.

Clone’s work adds to other projects that use tendon-driven joints, cable systems, and foam or rubber exteriors. As more labs and companies experiment with these designs, we may see standards emerge for how soft a robot should be in different settings, and how to certify its safety.

Sources & related information

Clone Robotics – Android product page – 2024

The company’s own page describes the Clone android’s Myofiber muscle technology, soft body, polymer skeleton with bone analogues, and water powered hydraulic system, presenting it as a biomorphic design with human-level strength. It highlights that the robot is powered only by water and electricity and includes a GPU for advanced control, as outlined on the official Clone android page.

LiveScience – Watch this terrifying robotic torso spring into life – 2024

This news piece covers a viral video of the Clone torso mounted on a pelvis, explaining how battery driven water pumps, valves, and a built-in water container flex the artificial muscles to create its unsettling movements. It confirms key technical details, such as the hydraulic powering system and the focus on realistic motion, in a short report on the terrifying robotic torso.

The Sun – Creepy faceless ‘Clone Alpha’ robot with synthetic organs, artificial muscles and even veiny arms coming next year – 2024

This article reports on the Clone Alpha android, noting its more than 200 synthetic bones, artificial Myofiber muscles, and a water based hydraulic system driven by a compact pump that acts like a heart. It also mentions early pre-order plans and example skills like making sandwiches, which show how the company imagines the robot in everyday tasks, as described in the coverage of the Clone Alpha humanoid robot.

IndustryInsider – Clone Alpha: a humanoid robot built with synthetic organs and artificial muscles – 2025

This feature article places Clone Alpha in the wider humanoid robot landscape, contrasting its water powered Myofiber muscles and biomimetic skeleton with motor-driven robots from larger firms. It traces the company’s path from a dexterous hand to a torso and finally to a full musculoskeletal android, and explains how its hydraulic artificial muscles aim to bring fluid, human-like motion to industrial and service work, as discussed in the profile of the Clone Alpha humanoid robot.

Interesting Engineering – Watch: Ghostly white humanoid robot with water-powered muscles unveiled – 2024

This article introduces the Clone humanoid torso and explains how a water powered hydraulic system drives its artificial muscles, with a focus on the creepiness and promise of the design as seen in a demo video. The piece also notes the company’s earlier work on a biomimetic robotic hand and its goal of industrial, not household, uses, which you can see in the report on the water powered humanoid torso.

Help us improve this article

Add a clear point? Share it in comment.

Link or video not working? Post a new one that works in comment.

Fact wrong or out-of-date? Write the correct info in comment.

Your feedback helps keep the content accurate and valuable.

 

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recently added

Listening is the underrated skill that makes you a better leader instantly

We often think of great leaders as great talkers. We imagine them giving rousing speeches, setting a clear vision, and having an answer for everything. But a massive review of scientific research suggests we have it backward. The most effective way to improve your leadership isn’t to speak more; it is to listen better.

New data shows that listening is not just a “soft skill” for making friends – it is a hard driver of job performance and professional success.

144 studies confirm listening drives performance

A recent meta-analysis published in the Journal of Business and Psychology examined the link between listening and work outcomes. The researchers looked at data from 144 studies involving more than 155,000 people.

Their conclusion was clear: listening has a strong, positive effect on employee job performance.

Leaders who are perceived as good listeners do more than just make their employees feel warm and fuzzy. They actually get better results. The study found that listening improves the quality of relationships at work, which in turn boosts performance. When employees feel heard, they perform better. This dynamic helps leaders unlearn bias and lower conflict within teams.

As the researchers noted, the link between listening and positive job outcomes is “robust.” They suggest that listening is an underrated predictor of job performance – a simple cause of superior results that many organizations overlook.

Why we love to talk about ourselves

If listening is so effective, why is it so hard? Why do so many of us default to talking instead?

The answer lies in our biology. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) found that talking about ourselves is inherently rewarding. In fact, humans devote about 30–40 percent of everyday speech to informing others about their own subjective experiences – their thoughts, feelings, and opinions.

Using brain scans, researchers found that self-disclosure activates the mesolimbic dopamine system – the same brain regions associated with the pleasure we get from food, money, and sex. It feels good to talk about yourself.

The drive is so strong that people in the study were willing to give up money just to keep talking about themselves. When given a choice between answering questions about others for a higher payment or answering questions about themselves for a lower payment, participants voluntarily gave up between 17 and 25 percent of their potential earnings to talk about their own views.

We are wired to broadcast. To lead effectively, you have to fight that wiring.

The power of follow-up questions

You can become a better listener instantly by changing how you ask questions. It is not enough to just stay silent; you need to show you are engaged.

Research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that the specific type of question you ask matters. The study showed that asking follow-up questions – questions that ask for more detail on what the other person just said – dramatically increases how likable you appear.

When you ask a follow-up question, you prove you were listening. You signal validation, care, and understanding. This simple habit makes you more persuasive and influential because, as other research in Frontiers in Psychology shows, likable people are better at influencing those around them.

Asking follow-up questions and recalling small details are among seven habits that mark an exceptional listener, and this research confirms it is a key tool for leaders.

Feeling known leads to feeling supported

Listening does more than build rapport; it meets a fundamental human need.

A study in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that employees feel less objectified when their boss knows them as people, rather than just as workers or numbers. Furthermore, research linked to the Journal of Experimental Psychology suggests that “feeling known” is a necessary precursor to “feeling supported.”

You cannot support an employee you do not know. You cannot help them reach their career goals if you never asked what those goals were. You cannot solve their roadblocks if you never listened to what those roadblocks are.

What you can do about it

To become a better leader today, flip the ratio of your conversations.

  • Talk less. Recognize that your brain wants the dopamine hit of talking about yourself. Resist it.
  • Ask for their story, not yours. Instead of telling your team about your weekend or your problems, ask about theirs.
  • Use the follow-up rule. When an employee answers, do not just nod and move on. Restate what they said or ask one follow-up question based on what they just said.
  • Listen to learn. You already know what you know. The only way to learn something new is to listen to what others know.

Mastering conversation: how active listening keeps dialogue engaging is a skill you can practice in every interaction, whether with a colleague, a client, or a friend.

Sources & related information

Journal of Business and Psychology – The Power of Listening at Work – 2023

A meta-analysis of 144 studies involving 155,000 observations found that perceived listening is strongly correlated with improved job performance and relationship quality.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding – 2012

Neuroimaging research shows that self-disclosure activates the brain’s reward systems, motivating people to talk about themselves even at a financial cost.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology – It Doesn’t Hurt to Ask – 2017

A series of studies demonstrates that asking follow-up questions increases interpersonal liking by signaling responsiveness and listening.

The Pratfall Effect: why making mistakes can make you more likable

Perfection is often overrated. While we strive to be flawless in job interviews or first dates, psychology suggests that being too perfect can actually push people away. A small blunder, like tripping or spilling a drink, might do more for your popularity than a flawless performance. This phenomenon is known as the Pratfall Effect.

What is the Pratfall Effect?

The Pratfall Effect is a psychological principle that states that a person’s likability increases when they make a clumsy mistake, but only if that person is already perceived as competent.

Social psychologist Elliot Aronson first identified this effect in 1966. He wanted to test how mistakes influence attraction. In his famous experiment, he asked male college students to listen to tape recordings of people answering quiz questions.

The participants heard one of two main scenarios:

  1. The Superior Person: This person answered 92% of the questions correctly. They sounded confident and knowledgeable.
  2. The Average Person: This person answered only 30% of the questions correctly.

Aronson then added a twist. In some recordings, the “Superior Person” commits a blunder at the end: they are heard spilling a cup of coffee and reacting to the mess.

The results were clear. The students rated the Superior Person who spilled the coffee as the most likable of all. The blunder made the highly competent person seem more human and approachable.

The catch: competence is key

There is a crucial condition to this effect. A mistake only helps you if you have already established your competence.

In Aronson’s experiment, when the “Average Person” (who missed most quiz questions) spilled the coffee, their likability rating dropped even further.

  • If you are competent: A mistake humanizes you. It breaks the “too good to be true” barrier and prevents others from feeling threatened by your perfection.
  • If you are incompetent: A mistake just reinforces the idea that you are not capable. It acts as proof of inadequacy.

This distinction is vital. You cannot simply be clumsy and expect to be popular. You must first demonstrate that you are good at what you do. The blunder acts as a softener for your competence, not a substitute for it.

Real-world examples: from Jennifer Lawrence to brands

We see the Pratfall Effect in action in celebrity culture and marketing.

The relatable celebrity

Jennifer Lawrence is often cited as a modern example. Her frequent trips on the red carpet or candid, unpolished interviews often endear her to the public. Because she is an Oscar-winning, highly successful actress (high competence), these slips make her seem “down to earth” rather than clumsy.

The honest brand

Marketing experts use a similar concept known as the “blemishing effect.” When a brand admits a small flaw, consumers often trust it more. For example, Guinness: the beer brand famously turned a negative – the long time it takes to pour a pint – into a legendary slogan: “Good things come to those who wait.”

Why perfectionism harms connection

The Pratfall Effect challenges the idea that we must hide our flaws to be accepted. In social situations, perfection creates distance. We often struggle to connect with someone who seems to have no weaknesses because we cannot relate to them. This relates to understanding conversational biases to become more likable, where showing genuine engagement often matters more than saying the perfect thing.

When a competent person slips up, it levels the playing field. It signals vulnerability. This vulnerability fosters trust and signals that the person is authentic, not a curated persona.

What you can do about it

You do not need to stage accidents or spill coffee on purpose. However, you can change how you react to your own errors.

  • Don’t hide every flaw: If you are good at your job, admitting a small error or a gap in knowledge can make you more approachable to your team.
  • Own your blunders: When you trip or misspeak, laugh it off. Trying to cover it up often looks worse than the mistake itself.
  • Build competence first: Remember that this effect relies on a foundation of skill. Focus on being capable and reliable first.
  • Accept imperfection in others: Just as your mistakes humanize you, seeing others stumble is a reminder that everyone is human. This perspective can help reduce judgment and social anxiety.

Sources & related information

Elliot Aronson – The Effect of a Pratfall on Increasing Interpersonal Attractiveness – 1966

The original study published in Psychonomic Science where Aronson and his colleagues demonstrated that a blunder increases the attractiveness of a superior person but decreases the attractiveness of a mediocre person.

The Guardian (ZenithOptimedia) – The Pratfall effect and why brands should flaunt their flaws – 2015

An analysis of how brands like Guinness and VW use the Pratfall Effect to build trust by admitting minor weaknesses, making their core claims more believable.

Journal of Consumer Research – The blemishing effect – 2012

Research showing that under certain processing conditions, a small amount of negative information can actually enhance the positive impression of a product.

Endmyopia claims to reverse nearsightedness naturally (but science remains skeptical)

Imagine never needing your glasses again. No surgery, no contacts, just… fixing your eyes yourself. That’s the big promise of Endmyopia, a popular online method created by Jake Steiner. He claims you can reverse nearsightedness (myopia) just by changing your habits.

It sounds awesome, right? But before you throw away your glasses, you need to know that most eye doctors and scientists say it’s not that simple. Here is the lowdown on what this method is, why people try it, and why the medical consensus says it probably won’t work like you think.

The big claim: “Your glasses are the problem”

Endmyopia is based on a simple idea: your eyes aren’t broken; they are just reacting to your environment.

It starts with a muscle cramp

The theory goes like this: when you spend hours staring at your phone or laptop, a focusing muscle inside your eye gets tired and cramps up. This is called pseudo-myopia. At first, your vision is only blurry because of this cramp.

Then your eye grows longer

The controversial part is what happens next. Steiner says that when you wear glasses to fix that blur, your eye physically grows longer to “adapt” to the lenses. A longer eyeball is what causes true nearsightedness. Basically, the method claims your glasses trap you in a cycle that makes your vision worse.

The “fix”: training your eyes

To reverse this, Endmyopia tells you to do two things:

  1. Use weaker glasses: Instead of your full prescription, you wear weaker glasses for close-up work (like homework or gaming) to stop the eye strain.
  2. Practice “Active Focus”: This is a mental trick. You look at something far away that is slightly blurry (like a street sign) and try hard to make it clear just by focusing. The idea is that this effort forces your eyeball to shrink back to its normal size.

What science says

Here is the problem: Eye doctors agree that once your eyeball grows too long, it usually stays that way. It’s like your height – once you grow tall, you don’t shrink back down just because you want to.

Your eyeballs aren’t like muscles

You can train a muscle to get bigger, but you can’t really train an eyeball to get shorter. While atropine drops or special contact lenses can slow down eye growth in kids, there is no scientific proof that you can reverse it significantly once it’s happened.

Wearing weak glasses might backfire

Trying to fix your eyes by wearing weaker glasses can actually make things worse. A famous study (Chung et al., 2002) showed that under-correcting vision (wearing glasses that are too weak) made kids’ eyes grow faster, not slower. Blurry vision seems to signal the eye to keep growing, which is the exact opposite of what you want.

Why do some people swear it works?

If science says it doesn’t work, why are there so many success stories online? Read on Reddit: I was able to effectively fully cure myopia with my own methodology of eye exercises and discussions about do eye exercise really work?.

Brain training vs. Eye shrinking

When you practice looking at blurry things, your brain gets smarter at guessing what it’s seeing. This is called blur adaptation. You might be able to read a sign further away, not because your eyes are fixed, but because your brain is better at decoding the fuzzy image. You are “seeing” better, but your nearsightedness hasn’t actually disappeared.

Is there any hope?

Interestingly, some new research on red light therapy shows that specific light treatments might slightly shorten the eye.

Is it worth trying?

Trying to fix your eyes this way takes a huge amount of time – years of daily practice. Walking around (or driving!) with blurry vision can be dangerous.

Sources & related information

Study: Weak glasses make eyes worse (2002)

A major study showed that giving kids weaker glasses actually made their nearsightedness get worse faster.

Experts: Can you reverse myopia?

Eye doctors explain that while eye spasms can be fixed, the actual shape of a nearsighted eye is permanent.

Endmyopia Website

The source of the “active focus” method and the theory that glasses are to blame.

Red Light Therapy Study (2022)

A study showing that a specific type of red light therapy could shrink the eye slightly, proving some change is possible.